2015년 12월 27일 일요일

What's Behind Wharton's Massive Bet on Online Learning


http://fortune.com/2015/12/22/wharton-online-learning/

An early move into MOOCs made Wharton an international giant in online education.

When marketing professor Peter Fader was asked to be one of three professors to build one of the first online classes at Wharton in 2012, he was marched to the corner of Second and South Streets in Philadelphia and told to face the lens of a video camera instead of students for the first time in his life.
“They turned the camera on and said ‘Let’s do a MOOC,” he laughs. “I had no idea what I was doing. There were no precedents. No one else was doing this.”
Looking to avoid a dull class filled with 101 marketing concepts, he cherry picked material from Wharton’s elective courses in marketing. At the time, Fader could not even imagine who would want to take the online course, an Introduction to Marketing, one of the first MOOCs Wharton would offer.
“My first impression was that the only people who would want this were senior citizens, housewives, or somebody in prison,” he quips.
Contrary to Faber’s initial expectations, MOOC learners turned out to be an impressive bunch. More than 90% have some college and most have a bachelor’s degree or higher. The age of learners tends to range from 25 to 44, and the vast majority are employed full time.
When Fader’s first course went live in 2013, he was amazed to get emails from engineers and managers all over the world. “These people are every bit the caliber of our MBA students,” he says. “I’d get an email from an engineer in Pakistan and lots of other people who would never have had the chance to come to Wharton.”
Three years later, more than 300,000 people have taken Wharton’s Intro to Marketing course, one of the top 10 business MOOCs on the Coursera platform this year. Nearly 100,000 more have completed his second MOOC on Consumer Analytics. Fader also has piloted an eight-week-long executive education MOOC offering called the Strategic Value of Customer Relationships, which includes weekly “Pete Casts,” essentially hour-long office hours for the 20 to 30 students who have enrolled in the $3,700 course It will be offered for a fifth time this spring.
Since 2012, some 2.7 million people have enrolled in Wharton’s 18 MOOC courses. More importantly, the school has awarded 54,000 verified certificates since 2012 and 32,000 verified certificates in specialization courses since April of this year. What started as something of an online experiment will bring an additional $5 million in revenue to Wharton in 2015.
Through it all, Wharton has firmly established itself as the leading business purveyor of MOOCs. It was the first business school to offer a MOOC, the first to offer a specialization, or series of related courses, on Coursera, and can boasts one of the highest MOOC enrollments of any business school in the world.
No less crucial, the school is now doubling down on its bet on MOOCs. Over the next 12 months, Wharton plans to launch at least two dozen new online offerings, including its first three SPOCs (small private online courses) on digital marketing, gamification, and advanced product design. They will all be offered on the EdX platform, the non-profit education startup founded by Harvard and MIT, at significantly higher price points than the $95 certificates for its single MOOC courses on Coursera.
Wharton also will bump up the number of specializations from two to five through July of next year. The school is hoping that its MOOC revenues will double next year, to at least $10 million.
The big bet is being placed by Wharton’s new Dean, Geoffrey Garrett, who views the initiative as a way to further extend the school’s brand around the world; reach users who would never be able to get to the school’s Philadelphia campus; get faculty more comfortable using technology to teach; and transform how faculty and students engage in the classroom.
“Coming into the job, I had two conjectures about it that have been borne out,” says Garrett, an Australia-born political scientist who became dean in July of 2014. “One, there is a real market for a taste of Wharton education for lots of people who can’t be on campus,” he says. “And second, we now know how to smartly integrate technology in the on-campus courses.”
More than 10% of our faculty have now had experience building and running online classes, he says. That translates into more than 30 professors who have been involved in Wharton’s MOOC efforts. Specializations involve multiple faculty working together to create a set of courses, with each professor contributing anywhere between one and three weeks worth of material. Wharton’s business analytics specialization, for example, represents the combined effort of 12 different faculty members.
Garrett says that he has since discovered that MOOCs can be used to identify talent that may ultimately come to campus for the school’s MBA program, and that the content Wharton has been developing can be a viable alternative to non-degree education, long the province of the school’s on-campus executive education programming.
“If it helps a person advance his or her career, it’s a bottom-up credential,” he says. “Non-degree education will increase pretty dramatically for those who find that the tuition and opportunity costs of either a degree or traditional executive education don’t make sense.”
While the early MOOCs were entirely free, including a statement of completion, Wharton is fast moving into a place where its portfolio of online offerings can become a substantial source of revenue for the school. Wharton led all schools on Coursera last April when it raised the cost for a verified certificate from$49 to $95.
“There was six weeks of anxiety over that decision,” says Anne Trumbore, director of Wharton’s online learning initiative. “But since then we’ve had 32,000 people pay for verified certificates. That is more than $3 million in gross revenue alone.”
The school’s specializations in business fundamentals and business analytics, composed of four courses plus a capstone project, cost $595 each.
Wharton also took its Global Strategy course, originally distributed on Coursera, and moved it to the EdX platform last month in a pilot at a cost of $149. “We got enrollment numbers that were just as good as Coursera,” says Don Huesman, managing director of Wharton’s innovation group, who believes the school can further raise prices in the future. “After all,” he says, “a used corporate finance textbook on Amazon goes for $200! We’re already making money hand over fist. This is Wharton!”
This strategic focus has not only made Wharton the business school leader in producing MOOCs and reaching a massive audience with them. Wharton also has become one of the major players in mastering the use of the technology to spread its knowledge and brand across the world. Two-thirds of the learners who have taken Wharton’s courses are outside North America, with heavy representation from India, China, Russia, and Latin America.
“The stats on how many people already have degrees and are outside the U.S. just hits us in the eyes,” says Garrett. “We are reaching learners we never would have reached. The pure marketing value of having millions of people sampling your education cannot be undervalued.”
One thing’s for sure: Wharton’s pioneering efforts have paid off in some important lessons. “Our efforts were product-centric and our original MOOCs were six-to-12 weeks long,” says Huesman. “We didn’t even think that a lot of people have busy lives with demanding schedules. Today, we’re being more customer-centric and asking what people need. They want the learning squished down into four weeks.”
Besides the shorter cycles, Wharton gained insight was what learners hoped to get out of a particular course. “We honed in on the concept of literacy in a business topic,” Huesman says. “If you are a general manager and don’t know a lot about customer analytics, you might want to binge learn this so you can go to a meeting and knowledgeably participate in the discussion.”
More from Poets&Quants: Ten Business Schools To Watch in 2016
Wharton believes its experience thus far proves that students prefer so-called asynchronous online learning that they can tap into at any time, no matter where they are in the world. “The market doesn’t require synchronous learning,” says Huesman. “If you re in Beijing and I’m in Philadelphia, there is no good time to get together.”
Another crucial lesson was that MOOCs were not about fame, despite the nearly instant celebrity status a MOOC might provide a faculty member. “This stuff is not about teaching,” insists Huesman. “It’s about learning. You don’t invest money to make faculty think they are Oprah Winfrey in the 21st Century.”
Ironically, perhaps, the greatest as-yet unrealized benefit of Wharton’s MOOC strategy may well be seen in old bricks-and-mortar classrooms.
“What we’re doing is using technology to get the low value, one way transmission of knowledge outside of the classroom,” says Huesman. “It is dumb to have a faculty member stand up in front of a class and deliver a lecture today. If we get that out of the classroom, all kinds of interesting things can happen in class.”
Less time devoted to that kind of rote teaching, Huesman says, would free up faculty to spend more time heading dynamic discussions at Wharton’s San Francisco campus or leading teams of students on experiential learning opportunities far afield from its Philadelphia campus.
“It can free up faulty time so they can craft learning experiences with students that are truly life changing,” says Huesman. “MOOCs are raising the bar for face-to-face education.”
Garrett agrees. “Ultimately, we want to use online content to provide a better experience for our students in the classroom,” he says. “We want class to be more interactive, team oriented and focused on problem solving. We tend to be in the learning-by-studying moment, but I think we are going to have to balance that with learning-by-doing.”
Editor’s note: A previous version of this story incorrectly stated that Wharton’s Introduction to Marketing MOOC debuted on Coursera in 2002. In fact, the course launched on Coursera in 2013.

Could Email Fix A Troubled Form of Online Education?

By The Numbers: MOOCS in 2015

https://www.class-central.com/report/moocs-2015-stats/ 

This article is just one in our 2015 MOOC Roundup Series. Find the whole series of articles here, and discover everything MOOCs in 2015 — from the most popular classes, to overviews on developments in MOOC platforms, to looking at the MOOC-future.

500+ Universities, 4200 courses, 35 Million Students 
The MOOC space essentially doubled this year. More people signed up for MOOCs in 2015 than they did in the first three years of the modern MOOC space’s existence.  Last year, we at Class Central estimated that around 16–18 million students signed up for MOOCs across all MOOC providers. That number has gone up to 35 million this year.
Coursera, the largest online course provider in the world (MOOC or otherwise), added 7 million new students to its userbase (and so it now has 17 million students in total).
This is the first time that the MOOC market has grown faster than Coursera. Last year, Coursera was bigger than all other MOOC providers combined, but in 2015 it accounts for slightly less than 50% of all MOOC students.
Coursera, edX, and Udacity are normally known as the big three. FutureLearn, which closed 2015 on a high, had a breakout year, and it now has more students than Udacity; this makes FutureLearn the third largest MOOC provider in the world now. They grew 275% in 2015 and are rapidly approaching the three million user mark. Along the way, they also launched what would be the world’s largest single session of a MOOC: 440,000 students signed up for one session of the Understanding IELTS: Techniques for English Language Tests course, which was taught by the British Council.

Compared to last year, the growth rate for courses has slightly slowed down from 100% to 75%. Around 1,800 new courses were announced in 2015, taking the total number of courses announced since the inception of MOOCs to 4,200. Originally, MOOCs started out as college classes that had been put online, but now course creators are adapting their courses to better fit students’ schedules. This means that semester-long courses are being broken down into smaller courses. This makes it difficult to capture the growth of the MOOC space in a total number of courses. There are some courses that can be finished within a couple of hours.

Credentials

There are 100+ Specializations, Nanodegrees, and XSeries 
In September 2013, edX was the first provider to go beyond issuing single course certificates. They launched their XSeries program, which consists of a certificate gained from completing a sequence of courses. Coursera and Udacity launched similar programs in 2014, which are called Specializations and Nanodegrees respectively. These “Big 3″ providers are working to establish brand new credentials using their own brands. The aim of these new credentials is to indicate some level of competence for high-demand skills. They charge for these credentials, of course; and though many doubt the value of these credentials, because their signaling value in the marketplace is still being established, quite a few students are choosing to pursue them. Because of this success, both Udacity and Coursera raised significant new funding in 2015, with the primary aim of creating more of these credentials.
Currently there are 100+ Specializations, Nanodegrees, and XSeries credentials, most of which were created in 2015, and we can expect that number to more than double in 2016. The projections for 2017 and beyond could be exponential. We tracked this trend early, and this enabled us at Class Central to introduce a free credential exploration and rating service called Credentialing the Credentials.

Subjects

In 2015 there was a distinct focus on monetization by MOOC providers. This focus has led to an increase in the percentage of courses focusing on the field of technology and business.The percentage of Computer Science and Programming courses grew more than 10%. Due to this growth, we had to split the single “Computer Science and Programming” subject into two different subjects — Computer Science, and Programming. To learn more about how we categorize these courses, take a look at our online course taxonomy, which we open-sourced earlier this year.
This growth in technical and business courses has led to a decrease in the humanities and social science courses, but overall there is still a healthy balance of technical and non-technical courses.

Providers

Not much has changed in course distribution. The top three providers by number of courses are still Couresra, edX, and Canvas Network. Like last year, Coursera still has the largest number of courses, and its course catalogue is twice as large as that of edX. Kadezne, a MOOC platform optimized for arts education, was the only new major MOOC provider to launch in 2015. It offers 30 courses from universities like Stanford, Otis, Princeton, and others. Some of its courses can also be taken for credit.

Languages

The share of English language courses has slightly reduced from 80% in 2014 to 75% in 2015.  There are couple of reasons for this:
1. the rise of region-specific providers like FUN (backed by the French government) and MiriadaX; and
2. the fact that US-based providers like Coursera are now targeting international markets, and as such are creating courses in regional languages.
After English, Spanish and French are the biggest languages in which courses are offered. Courses are currently being offered in 16 different languages, including Basque and Estonian.
This article is just one in our 2015 MOOC Roundup Series. Find the whole series of articles here, and discover everything MOOCs in 2015 — from the most popular classes, to overviews on developments in MOOC platforms, to looking at the MOOC-future.

Check MOOC Platform

Lifetime Learning: Discovering MOOCs

Coursera’s Hottest Business MOOCs

무디스, 한국 신용등급 Aa2로 상향…사상 최고(종합)

Aa2 이상 등급, G20 가운데 한국 포함 7개국 불과
무디스 "韓 선진국보다 높은 성장세…1인당 소득, 유럽 선진국에 근접할 것"
일본·중국보다 높은 신용등급…향후 하향 요인으로 구조개혁 후퇴 등 거론
(세종=연합뉴스) 김동호 기자 = 국제 신용평가기관인 무디스가 한국의 신용등급을 Aa2로 한 단계 상향조정했다.
한국이 3대 국제 신용평가기관에서 Aa2 등급을 받게 된 것은 사상 최초로, 무디스가 Aa2 이상 등급을 부여한 것은 주요 20개국(G20) 가운데서도 7개국에 불과하다.
무디스는 18일(현지시간) 한국의 국가신용등급을 Aa3에서 Aa2로 한 단계 상향조정한다고 밝혔다.
신용등급 전망은 '안정적'으로 제시했다.
지난 4월 무디스가 한국의 신용등급을 Aa3으로 유지한 채 등급 전망을 '안정적'에서 '긍정적'으로 올린 지 8개월 만에 등급 상향이 이뤄진 것이다.
<<EPA=연합뉴스 자료사진>>
한국이 무디스와 스탠더드 앤드 푸어스(S&P), 피치 등 3대 국가신용평가기관으로부터 Aa2(S&P·피치 기준 AA) 등급을 받은 것은 사상 처음이다.
무디스는 한국 신용등급 상향 이유로 건전한 신용 관련 지표, 정부의 제도적 역량 등을 제시했다.
무디스는 한국 경제가 앞으로 5년간 선진국보다 높은 성장세를 지속하고, 1인당 소득도 유럽 선진국 수준에 근접해 나갈 것으로 평가했다.
한국의 통합재정수지는 2010년 이후 흑자 기조를 지속했으며, 앞으로 국내총생산(GDP) 대비 0.5% 수준의 재정흑자를 이어가는 한편 GDP 대비 정부부채비율도 40% 선을 유지할 것으로 예상했다.
또 2014년부터 순국제투자 잔액이 플러스로 전환되고, GDP 대비 대외부채가 30%에 불과하며 단기외채비중이 30% 이하로 감소하는 등 한국의 대외건전성이 개선됐다고 평가했다.
무디스는 과거 한국이 구조개혁으로 외환위기를 극복한 경험 등에 비춰보면 이번에 한국 정부가 추진하는 공공·노동·금융·교육 등 4대 부문 구조개혁도 성공하고 잠재성장률을 높일 것으로 내다봤다.
무디스는 한국 정부가 공공정부 부채관리에 있어서도 애초 목표를 넘어서는 성과를 나타내고 있다며 공공연금 개혁이나 가계부채 구조개선 등 재정부문의 리스크 요인 등을 적절히 관리하고 있다고 밝혔다.
무디스는 향후 한국의 국가신용등급 조정과 관련해 구조개혁의 조속·확대 시행, 비금융 공기업의 효율성 제고 및 부채감축 가속화 등을 상향 요인으로 제시했다.
반면에 구조개혁 후퇴 및 장기 성장전망 악화, 공기업 등 정부재정 악화, 지정학적 리스크 고조 등은 하향요인이 될 수 있다고 지적했다.
기획재정부는 무디스의 등급 상향조정에 대해 "양호한 대외·재정부문 건전성을 유지하면서 경제 활성화 및 구조개혁을 지속적으로 추진하고 있는 우리 경제의 성과를 높이 평가한 결과로 판단된다"고 밝혔다.
3대 신용평가기관 중 다른 2곳의 한국 신용등급을 보면 S&P와 피치는 모두 AA-(안정적)이다. 무디스의 Aa3에 해당하는 등급이다.
무디스로부터 Aa2 이상 등급을 받은 나라는 한국을 비롯해 G20(주요 20개국)에서 미국·독일·캐나다·호주·영국·프랑스까지 7개국에 불과하다.
올 하반기 이후 많은 선진국과 신흥국의 국가신용등급이 하향조정되거나 부정적 전망을 부여받고 있는 상황이다.
기재부는 "어려운 대외여건 속에서도 우리 경제가 역사상 최고 국가신용등급으로의 상승을 이룬 것은 견조한 경제 펀더멘털 등으로 우리나라의 대외 신인도가 여타 국가들과 확연히 차별화된다는 점을 인정받은 사례로 볼 수 있다"고 밝혔다.
dk@yna.co.kr
<저작권자(c) 연합뉴스, 무단 전재-재배포 금지>2015/12/19 07:28 송고

인간 본성의 두 가지 상반된 면



인간 본성의 두 가지 상반된 면
아담 I
아담 II
커리어를 추구 함
야망에 충실한 우리의 본성
이력서에 담길 덕목을 중시
외적인 아담
무언가를 건설하고 창조하고 생산하고 발견하길 원함
드높은 이상과 승리를 원함
특정한 도덕적 자질을 구현하고 싶어 함
고요하고 평화로운 내적 인격을 갖추길 원함
옳고 그름에 대한 분별력을 갖고 싶어 함
내적인 아담
친밀한 사랑을 원함
다른 이 들을 위해서 자신을 희생하고 싶어 함
초월적 진리에 순응하며 살길 원함
창조와 자신의 가능성을 귀하게 여김
내적으로 단단하게 결합된 영혼을 갖기를 열망함
정복하고 싶어함
무언가를 만들어 내며 자신의 성취를 만끽

무엇이 어떻게 돌아가는 지에 대해 의문을 가짐

길을 헤치고 앞으로 나아가기를 바람

좌우명은 성공

실용주의 논리 / 경제학의 논리
들어오는 것이 있으면 나오는 것이 있다
노력을 하면 보상이 따른다
연습을 하면 완벽해진다
개인의 이익을 추구하고 효용을 극대화 하라
세상을 놀라게 하라
세상을 섬기라는 소명에 순응하고 싶어 함
거룩한 목적을 위해 세속적인 성공이나 사회적 지위를 포기하기도 함
그것이 왜 존재하고 우리가 존재하는 궁극적 이유가 무엇인지에 궁금증
자신의 뿌리로 돌아가기를 원함
가족과의 따뜻한 한 끼 식사를 감사해 함
좌우명은 박애, 사랑, 구원

도덕적인 논리
받으려면 줘야 한다.
자기 밖에 무언가를 내맡겨야 내적인 힘을 얻을 수 있다.
진정으로 원하는 것을 얻기 위해서는 자신의 욕망부터 정복해야 한다.
성공은 가장 큰 실패, 즉 자만으로 이어진다.
실패는 가장 큰 성공, 즉 겸손과 배움으로 이어진다.
자아를 성취하기 위해서는 자신을 잊어야 한다.
자신을 찾기 위해서는 자신을 잃어야 한다.

원문: “고독한 신앙인  Lonely man of Faith” Joseph Sovietchik, 1965
재인용: “인간의 품격  The road to character”  David Brooks , 2015


  •  우리가 이 두 아담의 갈등 속에서 살고 있음.
  •  위풍당당한 외적 아담과 겸손한 내적 아담은 완전히 조화를 이룰 수 없음.
  • 그러므로 우리는 끊임없는 자기 갈등상태에 놓여 있음.
  • 우리는 두 페르소나를 모두 충족시켜야 하고, 따라서 이 두 가지 서로 다른 본성 사이에 생기는 갈등 속에서 사는 기술을 익혀야 함.
  • 아담 I 과 아담 II 가 다른 논리를 가지고 있기 때문에 이 대결은 특히 더 어려움.
  • 아담 I 의 커리어를 키우고 싶다면 힘을 길러야 하고, 아담 II 의 도덕적 고갱이 (비틀린 나무)를 성장시키고 싶다면 자신의 결함과 직면해야 한다.

2015년 12월 9일 수요일

탁월한 리더의 15가지 특징

1. 바쁘다는 말을 하지 않는다 (They never say they're too busy)
자신의 시간을 어떻게 관리해야 하는지 잘 안다.

2. 문제에 대한 해결책을 제시한다 (They put forth solutions as often as they identify problems)
실수를 지적하기보다 그 문제를 어떻게 해결할 것인지에 대해 초점을 맞춘다.

3. 배움을 멈추지 않는다 (They never stop learning)
과거와 현재로부터 늘 배우려고 노력한다.

4. 구성원들에게 관심을 기울인다 (They give you their full attention)
지금 이 순간의 중요성을 알고 집중한다.

5. 계획을 세우지만 거기에 구속받지 않는다 (They have a plan, but they're willing to deviate from it)
목표 달성을 위한 로드맵으로서 계획을 세우지만 거기에 연연하지 않고 상황에 따라 유연하게 대응한다.

6. 시간을 지킨다 (They're punctual)
약속한 시간을 철저히 지킨다.

7. 일과 중 소셜미디어에 빠지지 않는다 (They stay off social media during the day)
일과 오락을 확실히 구분한다.

8. 친구가 많다 (They have lots of friends)
개인적, 업무적으로 인간관계의 중요성을 잘 안다.

9. 열린 마음을 가지고 있다 (They are open-minded)
자신이 결코 완벽하지 않다는 것을 인정하고 다른 사람의 조언을 겸허히 받아들인다.

10. 비판하기보다 도움을 준다 (They offer to help rather than criticize)
이미 일어난 실수를 비판하기보다 도울 수 있는 방법을 찾는다.

11. 자신의 행동에 책임을 진다 (They take responsibility for their actions)
자신의 행동과 그 결과에 대해 기꺼이 책임을 지는 모습을 보인다.

12. 성공에는 운이 작용한다는 것을 안다 (They realize success is part luck)
마음속에 큰 그림을 가지고 최선을 다한다.

13. 거절당하는 것을 개인적인 감정으로 받아들이지 않는다 (They don't take rejection personally)
비즈니스는 어디까지나 비즈니스일 뿐. 개인적인 감정으로 받아들이지 않는다.

14. 의견을 수렴하는 데 시간을 쓴다 (They take their time to form a opinion)
구성원들의 의견을 끌어내고 이를 수렴하려고 노력한다.

15. 시간을 낭비하지 않는다 (They don't waste their time)

시간이야말로 가장 소중한 자원임을 인식하고 허투루 쓰지 않는다.